“Are machines better than humans in image tagging?” - A user study adds to the puzzle

Thumbnail Image
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Heidelberg : Springer

“Do machines perform better than humans in visual recognition tasks?” Not so long ago, this question would have been considered even somewhat provoking and the answer would have been clear: “No”. In this paper, we present a comparison of human and machine performance with respect to annotation for multimedia retrieval tasks. Going beyond recent crowdsourcing studies in this respect, we also report results of two extensive user studies. In total, 23 participants were asked to annotate more than 1000 images of a benchmark dataset, which is the most comprehensive study in the field so far. Krippendorff’s α is used to measure inter-coder agreement among several coders and the results are compared with the best machine results. The study is preceded by a summary of studies which compared human and machine performance in different visual and auditory recognition tasks. We discuss the results and derive a methodology in order to compare machine performance in multimedia annotation tasks at human level. This allows us to formally answer the question whether a recognition problem can be considered as solved. Finally, we are going to answer the initial question.

Ewerth, R., Springstein, M., Phan-Vogtmann, L. A., & Schütze, J. (2017). “Are machines better than humans in image tagging?” - A user study adds to the puzzle. 10193. Heidelberg : Springer. https://doi.org//10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_15