Sources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage10411
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue18
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleAtmospheric chemistry and physicseng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage10433
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume15
dc.contributor.authorKim, P.S.
dc.contributor.authorJacob, D.J.
dc.contributor.authorFisher, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorTravis, K.
dc.contributor.authorYu, K.
dc.contributor.authorZhu, L.
dc.contributor.authorYantosca, R.M.
dc.contributor.authorSulprizio, M.P.
dc.contributor.authorJimenez, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorCampuzano-Jost, P.
dc.contributor.authorFroyd, K.D.
dc.contributor.authorLiao, J.
dc.contributor.authorHair, J.W.
dc.contributor.authorFenn, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorButler, C.F.
dc.contributor.authorWagner, N.L.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, T.D.
dc.contributor.authorWelti, A.
dc.contributor.authorWennberg, P.O.
dc.contributor.authorCrounse, J.D.
dc.contributor.authorSt. Clair, J.M.
dc.contributor.authorTeng, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorMillet, D.B.
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorMarkovic, M.Z.
dc.contributor.authorPerring, A.E.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-29T07:11:00Z
dc.date.available2022-07-29T07:11:00Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractWe use an ensemble of surface (EPA CSN, IMPROVE, SEARCH, AERONET), aircraft (SEAC4RS), and satellite (MODIS, MISR) observations over the southeast US during the summer–fall of 2013 to better understand aerosol sources in the region and the relationship between surface particulate matter (PM) and aerosol optical depth (AOD). The GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model (CTM) with 25 × 25 km2 resolution over North America is used as a common platform to interpret measurements of different aerosol variables made at different times and locations. Sulfate and organic aerosol (OA) are the main contributors to surface PM2.5 (mass concentration of PM finer than 2.5 μm aerodynamic diameter) and AOD over the southeast US. OA is simulated successfully with a simple parameterization, assuming irreversible uptake of low-volatility products of hydrocarbon oxidation. Biogenic isoprene and monoterpenes account for 60 % of OA, anthropogenic sources for 30 %, and open fires for 10 %. 60 % of total aerosol mass is in the mixed layer below 1.5 km, 25 % in the cloud convective layer at 1.5–3 km, and 15 % in the free troposphere above 3 km. This vertical profile is well captured by GEOS-Chem, arguing against a high-altitude source of OA. The extent of sulfate neutralization (f = [NH4+]/(2[SO42−] + [NO3−]) is only 0.5–0.7 mol mol−1 in the observations, despite an excess of ammonia present, which could reflect suppression of ammonia uptake by OA. This would explain the long-term decline of ammonium aerosol in the southeast US, paralleling that of sulfate. The vertical profile of aerosol extinction over the southeast US follows closely that of aerosol mass. GEOS-Chem reproduces observed total column aerosol mass over the southeast US within 6 %, column aerosol extinction within 16 %, and space-based AOD within 8–28 % (consistently biased low). The large AOD decline observed from summer to winter is driven by sharp declines in both sulfate and OA from August to October. These declines are due to shutdowns in both biogenic emissions and UV-driven photochemistry. Surface PM2.5 shows far less summer-to-winter decrease than AOD and we attribute this in part to the offsetting effect of weaker boundary layer ventilation. The SEAC4RS aircraft data demonstrate that AODs measured from space are consistent with surface PM2.5. This implies that satellites can be used reliably to infer surface PM2.5 over monthly timescales if a good CTM representation of the aerosol vertical profile is available.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/9804
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/8842
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherKatlenburg-Lindau : EGU
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10411-2015
dc.relation.essn1680-7324
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subject.ddc550
dc.subject.otheraerosoleng
dc.subject.otheratmospheric chemistryeng
dc.subject.otheratmospheric modelingeng
dc.subject.otheratmospheric transporteng
dc.subject.otherconvective cloudeng
dc.subject.otherensemble forecastingeng
dc.subject.otherintegrated approacheng
dc.subject.otheroptical deptheng
dc.subject.otheroxidationeng
dc.subject.otherparticulate mattereng
dc.subject.otherphotochemistryeng
dc.subject.othersatellite imageryeng
dc.subject.otherseasonalityeng
dc.subject.othertrend analysiseng
dc.subject.othertroposphereeng
dc.subject.othervertical profileeng
dc.subject.otherUnited Stateseng
dc.titleSources, seasonality, and trends of southeast US aerosol: an integrated analysis of surface, aircraft, and satellite observations with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport modeleng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccesseng
wgl.contributorTROPOSger
wgl.subjectGeowissenschaftenger
wgl.subjectChemieger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sources_seasonality_and_trends.pdf
Size:
4.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: