Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm

dc.bibliographicCitation.date2017
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage237
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleGlobal Environmental Changeeng
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage250
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume42
dc.contributor.authorvan Vuuren, Detlef P.
dc.contributor.authorStehfest, Elke
dc.contributor.authorGernaat, David E.H.J.
dc.contributor.authorDoelman, Jonathan C.
dc.contributor.authorvan den Berg, Maarten
dc.contributor.authorHarmsen, Mathijs
dc.contributor.authorde Boer, Harmen Sytze
dc.contributor.authorBouwman, Lex F.
dc.contributor.authorDaioglou, Vassilis
dc.contributor.authorEdelenbosch, Oreane Y.
dc.contributor.authorGirod, Bastien
dc.contributor.authorKram, Tom
dc.contributor.authorLassaletta, Luis
dc.contributor.authorLucas, Paul L.
dc.contributor.authorvan Meijl, Hans
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorvan Ruijven, Bas J.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Sluis, Sietske
dc.contributor.authorTabeau, Andrzej
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T10:48:39Z
dc.date.available2023-01-18T10:48:39Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes the possible developments in global energy use and production, land use, emissions and climate changes following the SSP1 storyline, a development consistent with the green growth (or sustainable development) paradigm (a more inclusive development respecting environmental boundaries). The results are based on the implementation using the IMAGE 3.0 integrated assessment model and are compared with a) other IMAGE implementations of the SSPs (SSP2 and SSP3) and b) the SSP1 implementation of other integrated assessment models. The results show that a combination of resource efficiency, preferences for sustainable production methods and investment in human development could lead to a strong transition towards a more renewable energy supply, less land use and lower anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in 2100 than in 2010, even in the absence of explicit climate policies. At the same time, climate policy would still be needed to reduce emissions further, in order to reduce the projected increase of global mean temperature from 3 °C (SSP1 reference scenario) to 2 or 1.5 °C (in line with current policy targets). The SSP1 storyline could be a basis for further discussions on how climate policy can be combined with achieving other societal goals.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10900
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9926
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmsterdam : Elsevier
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008
dc.relation.essn1872-9495
dc.relation.issn0959-3780
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc570
dc.subject.ddc333.7
dc.subject.ddc550
dc.subject.otherClimate change researcheng
dc.subject.otherIntegrated assessmenteng
dc.subject.otherScenarioseng
dc.subject.otherShared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs)eng
dc.subject.otherSustainable developmenteng
dc.titleEnergy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigmeng
dc.typeArticleeng
dc.typeTexteng
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectBiowissenschaften/Biologieger
wgl.subjectGeowissenschaftenger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s20-S095937801630067X-main.pdf
Size:
2.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: