Organizing Scientific Knowledge from Engineering Sciences Using the Open Research Knowledge Graph: The Tailored Forming Process Chain Use Case

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage1
dc.bibliographicCitation.journalTitleData Science Journal
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage36
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume23
dc.contributor.authorKarras, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorBudde, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMerkel, Paulina
dc.contributor.authorHermsdorf, Jörg
dc.contributor.authorStonis, Malte
dc.contributor.authorOvermeyer, Ludger
dc.contributor.authorBehrens, Bernd-Arno
dc.contributor.authorAuer, Sören
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-26T09:28:32Z
dc.date.available2025-02-26T09:28:32Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: Engineering sciences are essential for addressing contemporary technical, environmental, and economic challenges. Despite its data-intensive and interdisciplinary nature, the organization of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) scientific knowledge and data in this research field remains understudied. Engineers need infrastructures with services that support them in organizing FAIR scientific knowledge and data for communication and (re-)use. Aim: We explore the use of the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) as such an infrastructure by demonstrating how engineers can utilize the ORKG in innovative ways for communication and (re-)use. Method: For a use case from the Collaborative Research Center 1153 “Tailored Forming”, we collect, extract, and analyze scientific knowledge on 10 Tailored Forming Process Chains (TFPCs) from five publications in the ORKG. In particular, we semantically describe the TFPCs, i.a., regarding their steps, manufacturing methods, measurements, and results. The usefulness of the data extraction topics, their organization, and the relevance of the knowledge described is examined by an expert consultation with 21 experts. Results: Based on the described knowledge, we build and publish an ORKG comparison as a detailed overview for communication. Furthermore, we (re-)use the knowledge and answer eight competency questions asked by two domain experts. The validation shows a clear agreement of the 21 experts regarding the examined usefulness and relevance. Conclusions: Our use case shows that the ORKG as a ready-to-use infrastructure with services supports researchers, including engineers, in sustainably organizing FAIR scientific knowledge. The direct use of the ORKG by engineers is feasible, so the ORKG is a promising infrastructure for innovative ways of communicating and (re-)using FAIR scientific knowledge in engineering sciences, thus advancing this research field.eng
dc.description.fondsTIB_Fonds
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/18572
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.34657/17591
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherParis : CODATA
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-052
dc.relation.essn1683-1470
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject.ddc500
dc.subject.other(re-)useeng
dc.subject.othercommunicationeng
dc.subject.otherinfrastructureeng
dc.subject.otherknowledge grapheng
dc.subject.otherscientific knowledgeeng
dc.subject.otherTailored formingeng
dc.titleOrganizing Scientific Knowledge from Engineering Sciences Using the Open Research Knowledge Graph: The Tailored Forming Process Chain Use Caseeng
dc.typeArticle
dc.typeText
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorTIB
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
672b413aedeef.pdf
Size:
4.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: