Climate extremes, land–climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5°C

dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage20160450
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue2119
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume376
dc.contributor.authorSeneviratne, Sonia I.
dc.contributor.authorWartenburger, Richard
dc.contributor.authorGuillod, Benoit P.
dc.contributor.authorHirsch, Annette L.
dc.contributor.authorVogel, Martha M.
dc.contributor.authorBrovkin, Victor
dc.contributor.authorvan Vuuren, Detlef P.
dc.contributor.authorSchaller, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorBoysen, Lena
dc.contributor.authorCalvin, Katherine V.
dc.contributor.authorDoelman, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorGreve, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHavlik, Petr
dc.contributor.authorHumpenöder, Florian
dc.contributor.authorKrisztin, Tamas
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorPopp, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorRiahi, Keywan
dc.contributor.authorRogelj, Joeri
dc.contributor.authorSchleussner, Carl-Friedrich
dc.contributor.authorSillmann, Jana
dc.contributor.authorStehfest, Elke
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T10:48:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-18T10:48:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis article investigates projected changes in temperature and water cycle extremes at 1.5°C of global warming, and highlights the role of land processes and land-use changes (LUCs) for these projections. We provide new comparisons of changes in climate at 1.5°C versus 2°C based on empirical sampling analyses of transient simulations versus simulations from the ‘Half a degree Additional warming, Prognosis and Projected Impacts’ (HAPPI) multi-model experiment. The two approaches yield similar overall results regarding changes in climate extremes on land, and reveal a substantial difference in the occurrence of regional extremes at 1.5°C versus 2°C. Land processes mediated through soil moisture feedbacks and land-use forcing play a major role for projected changes in extremes at 1.5°C in most mid-latitude regions, including densely populated areas in North America, Europe and Asia. This has important implications for low-emissions scenarios derived from integrated assessment models (IAMs), which include major LUCs in ambitious mitigation pathways (e.g. associated with increased bioenergy use), but are also shown to differ in the simulated LUC patterns. Biogeophysical effects from LUCs are not considered in the development of IAM scenarios, but play an important role for projected regional changes in climate extremes, and are thus of high relevance for sustainable development pathways.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedVersioneng
dc.identifier.urihttps://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10915
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.34657/9941
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLondon : The Royal Society
dc.relation.doihttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0450
dc.relation.essn1471-2962
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376 (2018), Nr. 2119eng
dc.relation.issn1364-503X
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject1.5°C scenarioseng
dc.subjectClimate extremeseng
dc.subjectClimate projectionseng
dc.subjectLand-climate interactionseng
dc.subjectLand-use changeseng
dc.subjectRegional climate changeeng
dc.subject.ddc530
dc.subject.ddc510
dc.subject.ddc100
dc.titleClimate extremes, land–climate feedbacks and land-use forcing at 1.5°Ceng
dc.typearticle
dc.typeText
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journalTitlePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
tib.accessRightsopenAccess
wgl.contributorPIK
wgl.subjectPhysikger
wgl.subjectMedizin, Gesundheitger
wgl.typeZeitschriftenartikelger
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
rsta-2016-0450.pdf
Size:
1.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections